# Proposed: Changes to in-season auction tiebreakers

**URL:** https://community.ottoneu.com/t/proposed-changes-to-in-season-auction-tiebreakers/5668
**Category:** Wishlist
**Created:** [April 20, 2019, 1:59pm UTC](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/proposed-changes-to-in-season-auction-tiebreakers/5668 "2019-04-20T13:59:30Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nivshah](https://community.ottoneu.com/user_avatar/community.ottoneu.com/nivshah/32/613_2.png) [@nivshah](https://community.ottoneu.com/u/nivshah)
#### Post date: [April 22, 2019, 4:37pm UTC](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/proposed-changes-to-in-season-auction-tiebreakers/5668/11 "2019-04-22T16:37:25Z")

</div>

Seems David and I stepped on each other a bit here, but hopefully our explanations help clarify the thought process behind the proposed league setting.

The idea that nominating teams should get more credit for starting auctions has come from the community and is probably understated in my original post as an important factor in this proposal.

> [@Auction tiebreaker should go to the nominating team](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/auction-tiebreaker-should-go-to-the-nominating-team/5553):
>
> Should ties at the price of $1 go the the owner that puts the player up or auction. He is the one that actually thought to put the player up. I am 0-3 in losing coin flips on players I put up for bid. Doesn’t seem fair the second guy to bid $1 get the same rights. I mean he didn’t even bid $2.

> [@Lost a player at auction](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/lost-a-player-at-auction/1746):
>
> I’d started an auction in my league for Marwin Gonzalez, bid $1. The auction was supposed to end at 8:03 this morning, April 12. I was watching the auction page in my league at 8:03; Gonzalez still showed, and my $1 bid was the only bid posted. I went away from the site, returned a minute or two later, and found Gonzalez had gone to another team for $3. Not only that, but two other teams had bid on him. I don’t understand why I didn’t see these other two bids, and why I didn’t get the playe…

> [@Changing player adds for the better](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/changing-player-adds-for-the-better/3987):
>
> I propose a change to the way player adds work. Right now, when you nominate a player, it’s automatically made public, advertised for all to see. It’s put on the league home page and emailed to those owners who have notifications selected. I think how it should work is: the nomination is only made public if a second owner nominates that player in the 48 hours after he was originally nominated. If the 48 hours passes and no other owner nominates that player, then you get that player at his curren…

> [@Blind auctions for free agents in-season](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/blind-auctions-for-free-agents-in-season/3600):
>
> Have there ever been discussions about blind auctions for Free Agents so that everybody in the league doesn’t know who you’re targeting? As it is now, if I start and auction on a player that I like, everyone in the league has 48 hours to research that player and potentially out bid me. Maybe have something set up similar to the FAAB process for NFBC leagues but shorten the timeframe to 48 hours?

Starting auctions helps league health, but so does the giving overall priority of player additions to teams that are doing worse in the standings. Weighted chance is the fairest way to address this tension, and I believe better than doing nothing for teams that start auctions. I didn’t always agree that starting auctions was worth rewarding, but my mind has moved on that in the last couple of years.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.ottoneu.com/t/proposed-changes-to-in-season-auction-tiebreakers/5668)._
