For Teams in Season #2 and Beyond…
In the Yahoo Baseball Dynasty leagues I run (4 of them), I carry over NA and IL eligible guys separately so that we can keep our max 30 (without the NA/IL guys counting against that).
Here, there is no distinction between NA, MLB, 40 man roster players. That’s good in the sense that you can pick which NA guys you want to keep.
But, to encourage teams developing farm systems, and to encourage competition among drafting/retainining/trading for prospects (and not letting 1-2 teams monopolize this, as right now, I see some teams heavy on prospects and some teams with no MiLB players) and ensuring there is talent on the waiver for MLB FA’s, I’d propose having dedicated NA slots (that don’t count against our roster limits, more on that in a moment).
Now, I get it, in the offseason, there are no designations (NA or MLB), but what if we did this:
-
From end of the season to January 31, no limits on adds. Teams can be at 50 if they want to be (and some will over 40 b/c IL eligible guys are no longer reflected as such). So no change there (I read all the arguments pro and con against adding players, but I think teams can load up as they want, as this encourages non-playoff teams to be active and get better)
-
January 31, teams must cut to 40 man rosters. So also no change there.
-
BUT and, here’s change #1: “out” designations won’t count against the 40. We currently have IL guys labeled as Out. Ok, let’s work with that.
What if we expand IL to allow “outs” + IL guys BUT no one else – right now you can put active guys in there too (but let’s not allow that).
When managers place players designated as “out” in those IL slots, the eligible roster/players kept should be reduced by the player moved into the IL slot. Guys like Jake DeGrom are definitely IL. MLB teams can keep those guys, so why can’t we?
see e.g.: Rangers Transfer Jacob deGrom To 60-Day Injured List - MLB Trade Rumors
By placing DeGrom on the 60 day IL, it freed up a space on the TEX 40 man and I don’t think DeGrom comes back to take that spot between the offseason and the begin of play (as he’ll be re-designated 60 day IL on March 25 or so without a corresponding move from the Rangers)
-
So after teams move “out” eligible guys to IL and otherwise trim down to 40 or less, then, we draft.
-
After we draft, we’ll find that we have 30 active player roster spots and 10 MiLB spots. Only NA players can be in MiLB/NA spots. If you have 31 active players, you’re “over roster” and are frozen (same message we get now). So our NA and MiLB guys should be labeled NA in our system and we should be able to slot them into the NA/MiLB slot (currently it shows MiLB but anyone can move in there and you don’t have to have anyone in those slots)
I think this keeps our dynasty management (keeping IL guys we’ve kept all year) and farm systems in better shape. Let’s us keep our NA guys and develop them, and let’s us retain IL guys (just as the big league clubs do).
If at any time an “out” becomes active, then the system will make that team “illegal” and bar moves just like an overlimit team.
-N